voxanimus
<('.'<) (>'.')>
- Messages
- 1,685
i haven't seen much input by anyone vocally hindu on this thread (mojo might have been, but i don't want to assume anything) so i thought i might as well drop my two cents into the change jar.
but flaws within the supposed adherents of a religion that are intrinsically violative of the religion's basic creeds are nothing new. i have more of an academic interest in religion than a faith-based one--i enjoy learning about the mythology and doctrine of my religion (and all religions), but i personally don't ascribe much of the events in my life to the work of a higher power nor do i turn to one on a regular basis for guidance. that being said, if someone asks me, i'd say that i am a hindu. like most of the people on this thread, it saddens me, then, that the majority of the skanky brown girls i've seen getting wasted at clubs and whatnot would make the same admittance if asked when not mind-bogglingly shitfaced. but i'm sad that they make those choices as humans; that they turn to destroying the one and only body they have for ultimately ephemeral and not-entirely-satisfying entertainment. i, as a hindu, refuse to be ashamed or concerned about the body of my religious community because of the actions of a subset of it. such a generalization carries dangerous implications. i'm pretty sure that most of the people here would agree that all Muslims are not terrorists, despite the way that that idea is often portrayed as fact by the conservative American media. the generalizations that allow one to come that clearly fallacious conclusion are also the ones that i see when i see someone slight sikhism, hinduism, or islam (or any other culture, for that matter) because of the actions of a small number of followers.
but flaws within the supposed adherents of a religion that are intrinsically violative of the religion's basic creeds are nothing new. i have more of an academic interest in religion than a faith-based one--i enjoy learning about the mythology and doctrine of my religion (and all religions), but i personally don't ascribe much of the events in my life to the work of a higher power nor do i turn to one on a regular basis for guidance. that being said, if someone asks me, i'd say that i am a hindu. like most of the people on this thread, it saddens me, then, that the majority of the skanky brown girls i've seen getting wasted at clubs and whatnot would make the same admittance if asked when not mind-bogglingly shitfaced. but i'm sad that they make those choices as humans; that they turn to destroying the one and only body they have for ultimately ephemeral and not-entirely-satisfying entertainment. i, as a hindu, refuse to be ashamed or concerned about the body of my religious community because of the actions of a subset of it. such a generalization carries dangerous implications. i'm pretty sure that most of the people here would agree that all Muslims are not terrorists, despite the way that that idea is often portrayed as fact by the conservative American media. the generalizations that allow one to come that clearly fallacious conclusion are also the ones that i see when i see someone slight sikhism, hinduism, or islam (or any other culture, for that matter) because of the actions of a small number of followers.