Hrithik said:
I'm not hating, just want to get others' opinions on bhangra standards these days. I feel that placing/winning sets these days are mostly the ones that contain the best "tricks". With winning sets like NJW from BBC (yes they were dirty), and FCB from Bell (they were too) i feel like there winning because of the hype they're getting from the audience when they do tricks with their shikkah (saaps) and dangs. I.E Dang/Saap throwing and also light up/gimmicky saaps/dangs. I feel that this is taking way from bhangra even though our generation audience loves it.
Compare NJ from Jashan 2012 to like FCB from bell. I feel that standards are getting less "bhangra/folk" every year. Not hating again, just want opinions.
Feel free to post your opinion on standards in general as well.
I use to do policy debate in high school. (I know, surprising, right?) I remember this one debate at my first competition which wasn't going that well and I attempted a hail mary pass to try to save face. I don't remember the specifics..., well, actually, I don't want to remember, but I tried to argue how passing a certain social program would lead to something which would lead to something else which eventually would lead to global warming and then nuclear war. It was ridiculous and my inexperience showed.
The fact of the matter is that, if anything, recent placings from this past year show that
execution and
cleanliness play a much bigger role than tricks. In my opinion, far more so than last year. I haven't seen any performances from Bell, but from what I heard, while their stunts/gimmicks were good, FCB was clean, energetic and executed their set well. NJ Warriors at BBC this past year had a fast set that was executed well and had a lot of energy. Sure, they had tricks, but they became the easy bet to win because of their dancing. Recent competitions like Fever, BBC..etc having placings that prove this.
Tricks may help you win, but they will not be the only reason you win. The general consensus towards competitive bhangra is that whatever you do on stage, you should be clean with it and execute it well. Teams that employ tricks are adding a risk to their performance that will only pay off if they are executed well along with the rest of the routine. There are plenty of teams that do great gimmicks/tricks but do not execute the rest of the performance well enough to win. At most competitions, difficulty of the set is always rewarded, so if you have two teams who are identical in cleanliness/execution, the team with more intricate and more difficult choreography/formations and harder hitting gimmicks/tricks/stunts will win.
Also, stop comparing apples to oranges. From what I recall, Jashan wasn't the most modern competition and BBC has always rewarded teams that have gimmicks. If these teams had poorly executed routines and were very messy, then I may be inclined to agree with you, but many of the teams that have been winning recently have been doing so because they've executed their sets better than the rest, not because of audience reaction or gimmicks. Nuclear war is not coming just because a few winning teams are entertaining the paying audience with tricks and stunts. In fact, I'm inclined to believe that these bhangra standards with emphasis on dancing well and as a team is improving the bhangra circuit, not the opposite.