New user registration has been closed (as it was entirely spam). We encourage you to post in our Facebook group, even if it's a followup to an existing thread. BTF will continue to be archived and hosted here - Saleem
OOO soo down, that would be interesting hahaBDR Official Fan said:Well if there is a tie then I think that each team should send its 4 best dancer on stage to compete in a 2 minute dance off against the other team on a song of the judges choice. To me that would be awesome, but I doubt that would happen because I think there will be a winner in this one.Pooja said:Yes, I think it was the same way that one on mh1 was judged!Mike B said:isn't this kind of how they judged that coke comp in india last summer? it seemed like peers were involved in the judging, providing comments and whatnot...
I was told by some of the organizers that the judging sheets will be up on BTF the next couple of days after the competition...so that's good for transparency.
I love the one winner idea but that's going to be so haaaard, what if there's a tie?!
Agree!jvirk said:teams judging each other - or even having a say - STUPID STUPID STUPID
Vick said:I think letting the teams judge one another is a major mistake. If I danced for Empire, I would be pissed with this style of judging. I'm pretty sure the rubric is already set up to make sure that Empire does not place... Now you let your competitors have a vote, and we all know that Empire is the most despised bhangra team in the circuit, and it's a double whammy for them. Yea we all trust our peers to do the right thing, but the "right" thing never really materializes... In a competition of this calibur, I don't think its a good idea to "experiment"... Leave that for the loser competitions to refine and then pick up on it later on...The last thing I want to see is VCU losing to SGPD or Empire beating NJ by a miniscule margin that was determined by a vote from some of the teams competitors... That will be utter chaos and will ruin a night meant for the ages... If I were the Elite committee, I would change it up right now, this has catastrophe written all over it...
definitelyLaddi said:im looking forward to the performances more than who places! :jvirk said:teams judging each other - or even having a say - STUPID STUPID STUPID![]()
To look at it a different way...if there were real Bhangra judges (as in people who have danced and studied folk Bhangra), Empire wouldn't place because they don't execute traditional Bhangra in their routines. This method actually gives Empire and any other gimmick/formation-dependent teams a chance.Vick said:If I danced for Empire, I would be pissed with this style of judging. I'm pretty sure the rubric is already set up to make sure that Empire does not place... Now you let your competitors have a vote, and we all know that Empire is the most despised bhangra team in the circuit, and it's a double whammy for them.
+1 Thank you for reiterating my point:mrchicity said:I actually think this might be a good idea. Judging at competitions is always called into question, and depending on who's judging, past affiliations or even distance from what is current in the bhangra scene (meaning a judge may not be completely up to date with everything) are sometimes blamed for perceived errors in placings. In my opinion, who better to judge teams than people actively involved with the circuit right now. This is especially true for the teams at this competition, who are already widely recognized as the elite. It can be assumed that most of them are already familiar with what is necessary for a good or great performance and are quite skilled and knowledgeable about technical aspects, such as traditionality, execution and such. As for bias, I heard that they'll be tossing out the highest and lowest scores from team judges to help eliminate bias, and if it's true that scoresheets will be made available, then there's even less reason for prejudice against certain teams. I'm pretty sure that this would only work at this kind of competition though, these are elite teams for a good reason. I know I wouldn't want members of some new, unproven team judging at any sort of competition.
i think some competitions in india work like that? like at the end of a performance the captains of the competing teams rate the performance or speak about there thoughts on the performance.jvirk said:teams judging each other - or even having a say - STUPID STUPID STUPID