People enjoy performances for different reasons and can appreciate different things about a routine. For me, I've enjoyed watching JJ over the past years because the routines are well made and have a lot of thought put into them, from bigger picture to minutia. I haven't seen much of the other teams that performed at Elite this year, but I can't help but compare this performance to your last foray into the 16 man space (especially since it was also at Elite 8 ).
In that comparison, however, I liked the set @ Elite 8 2012 much better than this one. There was a lot of thought, purpose and precision then. This performance, on the other hand, seemed too random and sloppy at times. Perhaps, this new direction helped limit some of your handicaps as a team with dancers from everywhere and was why you clinched the win, from the looks of the scoring sheets, so easily. But Elite 8 2012, in my opinion, was a more intelligent set, Elite 8 2015 could maybe be seen as a smarter set.
For example, formations at Elite 8 2012 were 10x better. There were multiple creative formation mechanisms and not only did formations transition well from one to another, but every motion had a purpose and seemed carefully planned. Even the most unexperienced of viewers could figure out what the formation was at any point and how and why each dancer moved the direction that they did. In this set, there was only 1 formation that I felt was impressive and reminiscent of the formation smithery that we use to see in JJ's sets. There was a lot of sporadic movement or formations that seemed indiscernible on first watch. I guess, when the formation isn't super obvious, you can't also easily see if people are off and they definitely were at parts. (ie: It's easy to see when people are off in a 4x4 box, but not so much in something that was maybe 2 pyramids with people spaced between it, I dunno) Also, the vardii are so colorful/random that it's harder to identify the jodis as easily when everyone's moving around so it made appreciating the formations, if there was an effect that was intentional, more difficult. There was a lot of dancing in spot and a lot of staggers. Nothing against that, but I've come to expect more from JJ.
A lot of the dancers on this team are good in their own right. But there wasn't an impression of team unity in dancing and style that you got a bit more of in the past. You could tell the difference between styles and could notice dancers executing basic moves like punjab and makhani differently. It didn't seem like the choreography was standardized across dancers. The much faster tempo of this set compared to 2012, while making the set look much more livelier, helped to hide some of the inherent difference in execution but at times, the entire team didn't seem like they were finishing moves or weren't lifting their legs (walking) or getting low or executing with aesthetically pleasing good form. For me, I couldn't appreciate the dancing and choreography as much because it felt rushed and came off as sloppy at times. Also, the segmented spinnings/freeze/squats/jumps by different groups at parts were at times too quick, too subtle or seemed too without rhyme or reason that it really didn't add any value to the set.
Honestly, I think you guys were overdue for a win somewhere so congrats on that, but as you said, Shahrukh, it's more about making memorable sets. You guys have had some well-thought out, memorable sets over the years. I think going faster and having less obvious formations may have worked in your favor (you won, so I guess it did!), but I definitely miss the precision and the thought that was more so evident in previous JJ sets.