Thanks, Ashveer—I've seen that (and other) similar videos many times ;D I actually meant a video (??), which I thought you referred to, in which Jain talks about wanting to learn more. I might have mis-heard/understood your comment...perhaps it was a written statement somewhere, or an anecdote? Either way, that "statement" is important to register (props to you!) as part of the historical development. It would bring some form of closure to the little Masala Bhangra "arc"!
To sort of repeat but emphasize what i was saying, Jain [not Fonda] did not come out of left field when she made up Masala Bhangra. There were so few "bhangra experts" around that it was possible to not even realize there were any—if that makes sense. Anyone who had been dancing in shows/competitions a good amount (and preferably with a South Asian, not necessarily Punjabi background) was more or less qualified to represent the dance to the mainstream. Jain had won competitions, so there would have been nothing audacious in her starting the Masala Bhangra.
I first heard of Masala Bhangra in 2000, and was more intrigued or surprised by the commodification aspect than the dance form (again, which was not too different from what "most people" were doing).
I think I also talked to DJ Rekha in 2000 -- nothing formal or serious (she probably wouldn't even remember). But I didn't get the impression (and I'm not saying that you said this, Ashveer, just putting it out there) that she herself thought she was any "special" person in the bhangra music world. I think she embraced her position as someone that people considered "the first blah blah doing blah blah" but didn't have a big head about it. Recognition was more foisted upon her, by journalists and scholars. She, more than anyone, had become the "go-to" person to talk to about "this new bhangra music thing"—but she didn't claim to be an expert, just someone who'd been around at a place and time. Interviewers convinced themselves that Rekha was an expert on X,Y, & Z, when really she was only an expert on Q and they should have limited their questions to that.
I think we can also look at performances from
nowadays and ask "What in God's name are they doing?"
These people can all tell us something valuable if we historicize bhangra. Sarina Jain could probably say some interesting things about SoCal bhangra in the early 90s, just as Rekha told me a couple insightful things about what was happening in New York, a her generation experienced it, in the mid-90s. But people seem to ask them for general questions like "What is Bhangra? Where did it come from? What's it all about? What does it mean?" and we get answers that, predictably are going to sound whack or wrong to someone. And although I don't imagine there would be many takers for it, one actually could study the dance and music forms of their era and document what that was, on its terms, rather than treating it as something deficient in what we now consider correct and therefore basically considering it to be something we don't want to know (i.e. since we are only interested in the "correct").
Sorry for the heaviness-- maybe this cheap video mash-up I once made will lighten it up:
The Latest Traditional Bhangra Step!!