New user registration has been closed (as it was entirely spam). We encourage you to post in our Facebook group, even if it's a followup to an existing thread. BTF will continue to be archived and hosted here - Saleem
Haha, thanks for noting this Sulman. First off, I'd vote for Cornell, not because I'm a member of this team, but rather, I'd be voting for the Cornell Bhangra team from way back that influenced me in 2002 onwards. Second, I don't think teams should be left out because they're still active. Teams evolve a lot over the years, especially college teams, so the Cornell Bhangra team of now is not at all the same team from 2002.sulmoney said:kj, vibe, mbt, cornell, ubc, nj...those are the og teams of the modern circuit that influenced every team competing now in some way or other
and i dont think you should be able to discredit a team because they are still active. its not cornells fault that they are a collegiate team thats been going strong for what, 15 years or so?
faizan said:i really was close to putting Phul on my list...but I feel like Cornell took the spot because they had more of an effect of making popular than phul...
ENVY BANG-RUH said:Another rule, teams from certain years should not compete within the last 3 or 5 (take your pick, and let's stick with it) years to be considered HOF nominees. Just an opinion.
Money in the bank (shawdy whatchu drank)Saab said:Someone should actually do this during a weekend of a comp. Maybe elite 8 have an induction ceremony. You have to think bhangra has gotten to the point where things like this go from being wishful thinking to actual things to discuss and implement.
What would really be the point? Hopefully not to administer the Bhangra Hall of Fame. Any voting would be called into question as biased, until every good team is in.Nikhil said:I agree. But we need a uniform, centralized body of governance. There has been so much talk of doing this but no one to head it up. Maybe instead of a group of people wanting to throw a competition, they fund and establish the government.
We talked about this awhile ago, and it got hung on the issue of who would govern the body that sees the operations. I firmly believe my idea of a network of functional organizations (such as a group that maintains a judging database and recommendations, a group that consults and aids comps, and a group that listens and arbitrates on behalf of teams), is a better solution than some central organization. Essentialyl a backbone system that supports by providing constant communication outside of individual and limited-scope channels like competitions.Nikhil said:Big Sal,
The reason why I think we could do with some sort of centralized body is because of uniform recognition and standardization of judges, competitions, as well as merits (on a competition basis, team basis and dancer basis). I think we all take bhangra pretty seriously right? So it's about respecting the seriousness with which we take bhangra....making it legitimate so that it's not just a dance thing. I mean, we all train like athletes and we take every year like it's a season. So why not structure it as such? It could go hand in hand with BTF and it could support it even more, giving it official backing in a sense. A Hall of Fame would be just 1 of the many things that the organization could help construct, actually without bias my duddddddddee