I think that's the important distinction here. Bhangra as a modern stage art form has existed since the mid to late 1950s at the earliest (the first truly modern bhangra performances were the Republic Day performances of the 1950s). Bhangra as a folk dance, which strictly means modern bhangra's component parts, is far older.J Wong said:Bhangra what it is today (to a certain extent) was created in the late 50's and early 60's but bhangra as it relates to cooking hemp and celebration of the harvest has existed much longer than that.faizan said:bhangra was created as a dance form and is a part of punjabi culture
Yea, it was created in like 1960. You're complaining about the evolution of a dance that has been "part of punjabi culture" for like 50 years. My house is older than bhangra. so is my dad, the tree in my backyard, and rock music...haha
In my mind, you have to draw a distinction between modern stage bhangra and "bhangra" (ie: sammi, luddi, sialkoti, mirza, jhoomer, etc alone). Yes, the component parts are very very old, but their actual reimagining is not. When we complain about bhangra changing too much and worrying about what happened to folk, we need to realize that bhangra is a living, breathing art form which will be changed and reimagined based on the experiences of the people who dance it. It's evolving, it's not a static bloc.