Amanpaul said:
oJaLa said:
According to the rubric, I can understand why VCU won. But going off from the rubric, I would have to put it between NJ and SGPD for first.
I still don't understand this part, what exactly is dancing to the rubric? I'm a little confused about this
For each competition, the rubric has an X number of points possible for each different element, such as execution, creativity, traditionality, etc. In comparison to SGPD and NJ, VCU may not have been as creative, but they most likely gained more points in execution and cleanliness and what not. I think this will be more clear once the score sheets are posted.
Its two different things to judge a team while breaking everything down to a certain number of points in categories and elements, vs watching a performance and ranking the teams based on the performance as whole. If as a judge you were to watch all eight performances and only take notes on them, and then rank the teams on who you thought has the best overall performance, the outcome would be different than adding up all the points separately, though i don't think it would be a day and night difference. And like NCS said in his post about the judging, the top three teams were only separated by a point or two, so the rubric judging was not far off from the general audience's point of view.
This isn't the first competition where this has happened. Similar controversies have arisen in the past as well, and the logic behind it can be traced to the judging rubrics.