scaplash
Husky Bhangra (retired); KWG; GR
- Messages
- 127
^I agree with just about everything that was said here. You don't have to go much farther than BIB to see how teams like Alamo City, MOB, Buckeye, Spartan have practically no comments-whereas a team like First Class-much more "well-known" and successful- gets such constructive feedback and support.lkamalyan said:Shout out to Howie and everyone who has responded so far in creating a discussion. I apologize if I bring up anything that's already been said on another thread, but as a part of the problem, I'd like to offer a few thoughts.
I can only speak for myself and my experiences as a captain last year of a "lesser known" collegiate team. One of the most heartbreaking things after being introduced to this dance and culture, soaking everything up and being inspired to add to it, was not receiving much feedback from the community. Collegiate teams will always be plagued with the same problems that are apparent every competition season, but it's incredibly discouraging to post and look down the list of videos from younger, smaller teams with a "lesser" presence on the circuit asking for feedback and critiques, and a large majority of them have 0 replies. To me the reason for this is two-fold: the retired dancers of the "golden age" understandably don't use the site anymore and don't have the time to send any critiques or feedback, and the current community of younger, less experienced dancers are either not confident enough to post a reply or critique or are waiting for someone else to do it - classic bystander effect. I'm guilty of it myself. We get it, we may suck, and it may be boring to watch our videos, but we'd appreciate something...I've seen a few posts about this before and I think the current active collegiate team community needs to make a better effort to support one another and post feedback.
Now this isn't to say these teams should rely solely on what the circuit thinks of them and lose the ability to create and think for themselves. But for a team trying not to be a cookie cutter team and establish a name on the circuit, any response is better than absolutely no response at all. Feedback doesn't have to be lengthy or profound, just a thoughtful reply, something more to go on than what a panel of 3 to 5 judges say at a competition. The posts on this thread before me have mentioned the caliber of current teams being too low to be invited to competitions, for them to push the envelope and take risks, to innovate and bring something new to the table. While absolutely valid points (although vague and recycled), and a part of the problem: it becomes frustrating to do so at a pace fast enough to keep up when not very many of our peers offer any other sort of response. (Many thanks to those that do post feedback, please don't stop!) Even a simple "sick set, keep it up" or "your jugni segment didn't work for me" whatever it may be....I think it'd be really helpful, and would inspire teams to push themselves and each other to "bring back the fire."
Additionally, although I get just as excited as the next person when I see a kick-ass line up posted for a higher tier competition (and I can only imagine the considerations and stress organizers have to go through to set all of that up), the opportunities for less experienced teams to get more experience seems to be dwindling. Yes, smaller regional competitions pop up every now and again and their presence seems to be increasing (thank you to those!!) but these chances are also knuckled out by the teams with a heavier influence on the circuit looking for an easy cash flow. It can get incredibly frustrating as a captain to motivate my group of younger dancers (who are still trying to figure out their lives and futures) to continue practicing and putting in these long hours when the majority of my team may not see an opportunity for their efforts to be worth it. Many of us have been fortunate enough to know what it feels like to perform and compete and be in the presence of our peers and legends. I encourage more competition organizers (and thanks to those already doing so) to throw younger teams a bone now and again so they can experience that indescribable feeling keeping the rest of us going. Plus with the added measure of fresh faces at mixers, new connections between teams, more support and feedback, potential new rivals, etc etc...then maybe the next competition or the year after, these teams will come back better than ever. Who knows?
I know there are many more aspects, sides and loops to this, especially from competition organizers trying to sell tickets and make their own efforts worth it too. I've only said my part from my experiences and maybe I'm being too hopeful and optimistic...I also know I can't speak for other collegiate or private teams, but I sincerely hope more people post and this discussion continues (especially from those on collegiate teams who have successfully made it, we look up to you!)
I had the same struggles when i would post Husky Bhangra's videos up-I'd have to really push to get some feedback and comments and even inboxed some of the more veteran dancers-never to really get feeedback.
And while I could probably spend some time to discuss more the "fire" missing from the circuit-I think at this point- a lot of the important points have been said and we need to focus on tangible solutions on how we can actually fix it-this discussion comes up every 6 months and we all agree that the fire is gone and bemoan Bhangra's state of affairs- and then we go back to our usual lives.
Some suggestions I have:
[list type=decimal]
[*]I feel like there are a lot of people that make accounts just so they can read/see attachments on BTF-but never actually to contribute. I think that there should be some minimum post limit for the month/year or the account gets deleted. There is no point having an account just to be a voyeur about it.
[*]We need more collegiate-only competitions. It helps foster a stronger collegiate community and opens the door for those newer teams to develop and grow. Blowout is a prime example that it can be successful-I think if we could get the organizers in this conversation to really illuminate how they have been able to run the competition successfully-that could help.
[*]This is a bit controversial-but I really liked when Elite 8 released judging rubrics way back in hte day and I think WBBC did it this past year. If you are aiming to be a legit comp-even if you're new- I don't think there is any harm in holding yourself accountable by posting the rubric. The videos will be up-the placings decided- and while not everyone will always agree, I think it helps newer teams to see those rubrics and develop them. It lets teams get a feel for what a good set looks like-what good energy looks like to a judge. You could look at a rubric and see that hey-this team pushed the limit in terms of style and form-but didn't get points docked-or they changed phumaniya choreo and the only reason it didnt work was lack of standardization. What I'm trying to say is that releasing rubrics can break down stigmas people have about deviating from traditionality.
[*]I think that we need more veterans like Kuntal and Mariam (only mentioning these two bc of how they helped my team personally). Kuntal judged us at Nashville and even after gave us some really in-depth advice which literally changed the way I look at sets and segments. And mariam has consistently given good feedback, and continues to help out on here with videos of betkas, and giving tips where she can.
[*]The team asking for feedback should discuss with the people giving feedback-nothing is set in stone when it comes to NA bhangra-if someone gives a critique, feel free to discuss with them on it-its gotta be a two way street.
[/list]
I'll edit this post if I come up with any more-these are all just ideas that I hope we can discuss and progress and try to get some tangible change out of all of this.