Vick said:
Hans, your second statement was useless, be a man and speak your mind, dont hide with your tail between your legs...
"Be a man." Really? Well if you're gonna question my
manliness I guess I have to respond, I can't think of anything more important than that. Not rationality, measuredness, deliberation, humility. None of that. I actually think my earlier statement was quite useful in highlighting how ridiculous your claims were, but that's a matter of opinion I guess. But just to make you happy (and since I've got nothing better to do)...
Vick said:
Jordan needs 4 othe guys... Golf is not a sport... Roger Federer is good, but he's not the Bonds of Tennis, more like Albert Pujols...
Wow, well I'll let Meistro handle the Jordan part since he clearly knows more about that than I do.
"Golf is not a sport," I can't really argue with since you provide absolutely no reasons for thinking this, but I can ask you a relevant question that might get to the root of this. Do you think Shooting or Archery are sports? Because the International Olympic Committee does, and I don't think shooting a gun requires much more exertion than swinging a golf club (probably much less, actually). But then again, I don't know why you don't think golf is a sport...
Roger Federer - I don't care about baseball at all, and I won't pretend to know it, but the simple fact that you would compare Federer, a household name and probably one of the most dominant athletes in any sport in any era, to Pujols, a baseball player I've only ever heard of in passing (again, I'm not a baseball fan), is kind of ridiculous. Let me direct you to this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Records_held_by_Roger_Federer. I know, it's a long list, so let me give you a taste:
Federer is the only male tennis player to have won eight Grand Slam singles titles in three years (2005-07) and twelve in five years (2003-07). Roy Emerson won 12 Grand Slam singles titles in 7 years (1961-67), and Sampras won 12 of those titles in 10 years (1990-99).
Does Pujols have an entire Wikipedia entry devoted
only to his records? Nope. Neither does Bonds, actually, and here's how small his list is in comparison
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Bonds#Records_held. All this, and Federer was never suspected of drug/steroid use, either.
Also, just to make things clear, I don't know you and I don't have any problem with you personally. I actually think a lot of your posts are hilarious (intentionally or not), and I'm glad you're around here for that reason, but I just can't disagree with you more on so many things.